Thursday, December 10, 2015

THE MARKET FOR GOVERNMENT JOBS

FROM BUSINESS WORLD OF 3 OCTOBER 2006


Government as a racket


I recently hired a car at Bombay airport. The driver turned out to be unusually talented. He gave me numerous tips on how to make Indian ceremonial food – like what to do when in cooking Rajbhog or Shira. Since I am a culinary illiterate, the tips were wasted on me, but I was impressed by his mastery of the minutiae.
I asked him what he was doing driving a car if he was such a good cook. He said that he was actually a watch repairer. He came from a poor family, and Aga Khan Trust had put him through a residential school called the Ashram. We passed a wooded estate near Marve Beach belonging to some charitable trust, and he recalled how he stayed there for a fortnight on a trip organized by his benefactors. In this Ashram, he and his fellow children were given practical training that would make them independent later in life. That is how he came to learn cooking as well as watchmaking.
I asked him why he was not repairing watches. He said he had a cubicle whence he operated on some road in north Bombay. He paid Rs 2,000 in rent, and made Rs 1,500-2,000 a month besides. But his shack was considered an encroachment. One day the municipal bulldozers came and leveled it. He could have got another shack, but the demolition drive had raised rents. Now a similar cubicle would cost Rs 6,000 a month; he could not afford it.
But he was not happy driving a rental car. The renting agency made much of its money driving passengers coming from abroad. For some strange reasons, international flights arrive only at night. So my driver had to work at the most inconvenient hours, and got barely five hours at home – if he was lucky. He had a wife and child, and wanted to see them more often.
He thought he had found the right answer – a government job. he met the man who would get it for him. He got to know the leader of the Bombay airport trade union, who has the same surname as a famous Maratha dynasty. This man told him that for Rs 25,000, he would fix him a job in Airport Authority of India (AAI). To show that he was earnest, he took my driver to Delhi and into the bungalow of a BJP Member of Parliament from Madhya Pradesh who lives round the corner from Sonia Gandhi. He introduced my driver to the MP’s secretary, and told him his work was done. That was over a year ago, and my driver still has not got the job. When he asks the trade union leader, the leader tells him to go and do his worst.
The leader cheated my driver; and it is implausible that he cheated my driver alone. This sort of criminal activity is not worth the risk unless it is done on a large scale. So it is likely that the leader is running a racket. In which case, it cannot be a racket to deprive gullible people of Rs 25,000 each. Every man cheated creates an enemy, and the risk of being beaten up, done to death or thrown into jail multiplies. Hence the racket most likely involves fixing people in jobs in AAI. That would require collusion with someone in the government or someone who has influence over government appointments; and who better than a Member of Parliament who sits in a Parliamentary Committee overseeing the aviation ministry? So prime facie, I would suspect a Delhi-based racket; the trade union leader is likely to be just a commission agent.
It is a well established statistical fact that government jobs pay more than comparable private sector jobs. And they offer complete job security. So if they were auctioned, they would fetch a premium. They are actually being auctioned; what my driver did was to pay the premium. His problem is that since this is an illegal market – a hawala market in jobs – if he does not get his due for the premium he paid, there is nothing he can do.

Such auctioning of jobs led to indiscriminate creation of jobs irrespective of need; that is how all governments in India got overmanned. But that was in the 1970s; there has been little expansion of government employment in the past two decades. The auctioneers’ solution was to create pseudo-government institutions to which the ban on job expansion did not apply. AAI is one of those. It rakes in enormous revenue by taxing flights and airlines, and can employ unnecessary drivers, whose jobs are placed at the disposal of people like our MP  to make a buck out of. That is why I think that the less the government does, the better.