Wednesday, December 2, 2015

SUPREME COURT'S BAN ON HOARDINGS

Indian media seldom carry comment on - let alone criticism of - legal judgments; if anyone writes such criticism, he is unlikely to find a publisher. The result is that courts pronounce on many matters that have nothing to do with justice - for instance, hoardings - and make insufficiently considered decisions. This was a rare instance when Business World carried my criticism ON 22 September 2003.


Remove this ban


Sometimes the thought processes of Supreme Court justices go beyond the comprehension of the ordinary man. One case is the ban they imposed in 1997 on hoardings in Delhi. Their reason was that hoardings distracted motorists and caused accidents. Did any motorist who had caused an accident declare that he was watching the blonde on the billboard? Was the frequency of accidents per passing vehicle greater at points facing a hoarding? No such evidence was presented or sought. The public interest petition which occasioned it just asserted the chain of causation. There was no law, either legislative or common, on hoardings; the Supreme Court was creating law. And it could do so only because there is no appeal against its verdicts.
Now the epidemic is spreading. Other cities are not sure whether the Supreme Court’s fiat applies only to them. But elsewhere also a zealous despot gets into power once in a while, and hoardings begin to be removed. But the Supreme Court’s authority is tempered outside Delhi by bureaucratic cupidity; so the ban is never quite fully applied. All it has resulted in is chaos.
Only a high dignitary who is driven everywhere would think that hoardings distract motorists. The first time a motorist sees a hoarding, he will give it perhaps a second or two. The next time, it will occupy half that time. Most motorists will be driving past a hoarding the 16839th time; they will barely give it a glance. But generally it will cheer them up.
The argument would be, however, that every second the motorist takes his eyes off the road is full of hazard. This is completely incorrect. Their lordships may think that the sun is the greatest distraction to the motorist: it is 393,000 miles off the road, and it can not only distract but also blind. Actually, a good motorist will watch the position of the sun often. If it is in his eye, he will have to watch the road carefully, for it may blind him at any moment. Objects will be less easy to spot at midday when they do not throw shadows. The road is full of surfaces that reflect the sun – car mirrors, windows of buildings – which can unexpectedly dazzle a driver.
This is not casuistry; the road is full of dangers, and it is the task of the motorist to deal skillfully with them from one moment to the next. A good motorist has a roving eye; he takes in everything on and off the road. He will fail to do so sometimes; if he is then close to a vehicle, person or animal, he will have an accident. The most frequent causes of accidents are:
  • Undue proximity: The key to road safety is maintenance of minimum distance; the closer the objects, the more likely an accident. Driving too close and butting in front of other vehicles are most frequent causes of accidents.
  • Mixed traffic: If vehicles with different speeds, maneuvrability and braking distances drive on the same road, faster vehicles will have to brake often, and a failure to brake in time or without sufficient separation will cause an accident. The biggest causes of accidents are pedestrians and cows; the next biggest, mixing of two-wheelers, cars, trucks and buses.
  • Unsafe vehicles: A failed brake, a burst tyre, an engine that suddenly cuts out – these can cause accidents even when the driver is most skilful.
  • Road width variations: Whenever the road narrows, traffic must slow down; if a driver does not expect it, he may hit the vehicle ahead. In India, road builders often ignore the need for constant width. Even when the road width is constant, the corridor may be narrowed by road works, breakdowns, potholes etc. The quality of public works and traffic control are major variables in accidents.
Let me end with an illustration and a prediction. The Japanese bridge from NOIDA is built to the highest standards. But one steel drain on it has been broken for over a year, and been covered with a traffic barrier. One night a truck driver will run over it and kill himself. Till then, it will not be repaired.